I count the leading
figures of Jersey's “Reform Jersey” political party among my
personal friends. I wish them to remain so, thus I shall take pains
to be temperate in this critique of their latest tactic. However, I
disagree with it too strongly, not to challenge it at all.
(Background for
non-Jersey readers: The island has a unicameral parliament, but with
three different modes of election for the members, having different
titles for functionally the same office.)
Senator Zoe Cameron
was frozen out from working on her subjects of special interest and
competence by the Council of Ministers, was totally ineffectual and
rapidly became disengaged. To her credit, instead of serving out her
full term as a waste of space, she admitted her failure and stood
down so that another could put her seat to better use. So, we have an
island-wide by-election to look forward to.
The purpose of a
by-election is to replenish the House to its full complement of
working members, that is all. The ballot asks no other question of
voters than, which of the candidates do they prefer to take office.
In practice, for many voters, the choice is who is the least
unacceptable, rather than whom do they want, but it is still about
filling a vacant office with another holder.
Reform Jersey have
disappointed me greatly, by putting forward Deputy Sam Mezec as a
candidate for the by-election. Now, this is not going to be an ad
hominem attack on Sam: I know
him personally, like him a lot as someone to talk with about our
mutual interests, and I approve of him as a politician. However, I
believe that his candidature in this election is wrong in principle
on multiple levels.
The
first objection I have is that Sam is already a member. If we vote
for him, and he wins, then we have made no change at all, but simply
delegated the choice of who the new member eventually is to the
electorate of Sam's current constituency as a Deputy. This is an
abdication of our democratic right to no discernable benefit. We
have no idea who the candidates would be in the consequent
by-election there, and, moving
from principle to strategy,
it is one of Jersey's most bipolar constituencies, with a track
record of electing both very right-wing and very left-wing candidates
to its multiple seats, so we
can hardly count on them to give us another in Sam's mould, even if
Reform Jersey offer them one.
My
second objection is that Reform Jersey are justifying the plan with
some sophistry about how a vote for Sam serves as a referendum on the
proposed Medium Term Financial Plan. No: As I said above, the vote
chooses a new Senator, that is all. It is quite possible to
disapprove of the MFTP and also want to see one of the other
candidates become the new member of the House, and totally impossible
to legitimately deem votes on an explicit question of who should be
elected to office as referendum votes on another matter entirely. I
am pretty sure all the RJ leadership are sharp enough to understand
that, so to suggest otherwise
is a cynical ploy that I am somewhat less than proud of them for
stooping to. Disowning them as friends would be a gross
over-reaction, but I am not going to pretend I approve of the
duplicity.
A
more trivial objection is simply this: Elections have a substantial
cost, to the public purse, to the candidates and in the time of
honorary officials and volunteers working pro bono
publicae. To contest an election
with an intention to simply cause another is an irresponsibly
wasteful plan.
Now
RJ have announced this, they are pretty much obliged to go through
with it. So, I shan't waste
my time calling on them to think again. I can address my fellow
voters, though. If you have no sympathies with Reform Jersey anyway,
do what you would have done. If, however, you are like me in wanting
Sam to be in the States, we already have him there: We do not need to
waste our votes on him now. By the time all candidates have declared,
there will at least one credible and capable progressive candidate in
the field, whom we can get behind to fill Senator Cameron's place to
good effect.
6 comments:
If this is the kind of stuff you write about your friends I'd hate to see the stuff you would write about your enemies. Talk about stabbing in the back!
It's worth voting for Sam just to see how uncomfortable the other Senators look with Sam sat amounst them. Especially when it's televised. Priceless.
This is an excellent piece of analysis. It's about principle not favouritism. But in effect all the vote will do is show how little support the perfectly pleasant Sam has outside St Heiler.
Why. This isn't a game. This is about the future of jersey. Play childish games elsewhere.
In fact, at least two of the other candidates, Sarah Ferguson and John Young are both critics of the Medium Term Plan, so a vote for them increases the chances of more critics in the house - we do not know who would replace Sam, either for or against the MTP. The argument by Reform is exceedingly week from a game theory perspective.
Yes I agree. He'll shake them up that's for sure. They will have to think very carefully before making any more foolhardy suggestions OMHO.
Post a Comment